![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If you can put enough tension on the halyard, then maybe you can get good sail shape. I am limited by not wanting to break anything with an old boat. We fly the sail off a spinnaker block attached to an old bronze ring that is just not set up for downward loading, you may be able to get more tension on your halyard and therefore better upwind performance. Hope this was useful. Allen L-36.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I am thinking to use a luff furler like used on code 0 furlers ie Facnor.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have a Facnor FX2500 that I use in three different applications.
The boat is a masthead rigged Beneteau First 38
I need the 1:2 halyard to get enough tension on the stay sail, Another option is to rig a 1:2 tackle at the tack. The Solent jib (came with the boat) have a high modulus luff rope, but it is also made with a luff tape so it can be hoisted on the head sail furler profile. I have always used it on the Facnor FX, never on the headstay. The head sail is self tacking with one long standing batten (give more roach at the top of the sail while it can still be furled). This is a flexible configuration that works well for us. Last edited by knuterikt : 12-15-2012 at 06:36 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() With a furler (non structural) as the OP suggests, this would not be a problem
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hello,
A sail set on its own luff is not a novelty, any more than luff sag with such sails is. The benefit of stays is that they provide the function of keeping the luff relatively flat, without excessive tension, elasticity, or compression. This leaves the halyard to handle the job -- shared with clew and tack -- of projecting the sail in an efficient shape. Where loads are lower, and sail fullness is desirable (i.e. off the wind) setting a sail on its own luff can be a good thing, but even then too much load and/or elasticity can be a problem. High modulus fibers don't change any of this; they just give us stronger, lighter tools to work with. Even if you use a high-modulus rope luff, tied to a high-modulus rope halyard, you are still placing a greatly increased demand on the halyard and its gear (note that the furler swivels, winch, and clutch are not designed for this kind of load, and that the load is roughly doubled on the halyard block),because you are asking the sail and halyard to take on the function of the stay. So at least for a storm stays'l, keep the stay. Then make it as easy and safe to set and strike as possible. A downhaul, properly rigged and led aft, can allow you to do both jobs from the cockpit; the sail is kept on deck, furled, with the downhaul slip-hitched along its length, until you need to hoist. This is simple, cheap, and utterly reliable. Fair leads, Brion Toss |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Asymmetric: 90 m2 / 969 ft2 Code 0: 80 m2 / 861 ft2 Staysail: 30 m2 / 322 ft2 The 1:2 halyard for the staysail (solent jib = 26 m2) have the standing end attached to a stay tang while the running part goes over one of the mast head sheaves (via a lead block). So the load on the winch/clutch/sheave is still acceptable. The spinnaker halyard block attachment has been strengthened by fitting a new custom designed spinnaker crane (to carry the load from the code 0) and beefed up blocks. The bowsprit have three positions (fully retracted, half way out and fully extended) and is fitted with an adjustable bob stay. When we use the Code 0 the bowsprit is set in the half way out position. The code 0 sets on 1:1 halyard but have an 1:2 adjustable tack line My storm stays'l is set on a wire stay ![]() Note on loads: When we bought this boat the solent jib was on the sail inventory. The original setup by the PO had a halyard box (where I now have the stay tang) with a 1:1 halyard and a 1:2 tackle at the tack. The sheave in the halyard box where lost - probably damaged by overloading, so yes there are forces in play here. I think I can understand why - this is the procedure he described Dont try this at home Quote:
Last edited by knuterikt : 12-17-2012 at 03:56 AM. Reason: Added note on loads |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi again,
Sounds like bases are covered. I'm particularly glad to hear that the storm stays'l is on a stay. No surprise on that sheave; I've seen them crushed, even without the, um, enthusiastic tuning procedure of the previous owner. But I'd still recommend caution, as that 2:1 now gives you god-like power... Fair leads, Brion Toss |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|