![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hello,
The question was, I believe, whether a keel-stepped mast is "stronger" than a deck-stepped one. The answer is no. However, a keel-stepped mast is definitely stiffer than a deck-stepped one, and that, as Ian points out, is information that any engineering manual can confirm. So if you want to save weight, and there's room below, basically keel-stepped is the way to go. If you want to raise and lower the mast, or play with extremes of rake under way, or want to build a boat more cheaply, or any number of other considerations, then go deck-stepped, and up the scantlings accordingly. Fair leads, Brion Toss |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks all, for the input. I don't have deck-stepped now, but if I ever get tired of cruising and build another boat, it will be something a lot smaller, definitely with a tabernacle for the sake of space.
I was thinking mostly of strength (not breaking), and stiffness had not ocurred to me, so I'm grateful for that extra consideration. Back to my musing........ Ben |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|