SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 11-17-2006, 06:49 AM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default

Hello,
The fore-and-aft sweep of the lower shrouds locates the mast in that plane, bend or no, and deals with the cyclic as well as standing force there. With your mast, moving the forward mast to athwartships wouldn't affect bend ó there isn't any ó but you would be leaving the aft lowers' pull unopposed, and this would induce bend, and not the good kind. Early Baba's had the arrangement you are proposing, and they all had inverted masts, which contributed to weather helm. They also had aft-led intermediates to make matters even worse, but that was just gravy.
Lots of boats have more sweep aft than forward, making for a slightly less problematic arrangement, but not by much.
Therefore, you might consider losing the aft lower as well, and just having an athwartships lower. It would have to be heavier wire, so we need to know if the chainplate is up to the challenge. Likewise you'd probably need to change the upper tang. Run the numbers on this. If they look good, you'll have the solution.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.